Frontline vs. Covert
In the Vietnam War, a combination of Frontline assault and covert operations joined unique tactical components which ultimately led to an effective strategy. Frontline assault required usage of larger more general forces such as basic infantry, while covert operations used smaller more specific forces such as special operation teams. This led to frontline assaults implementation in broader situations where a larger force was needed. Covert assaults were more beneficial for specific situations where highly trained teams such as Sea Air and Land (SEAL) units could be used for precision engagements. This allocation of troops allowed for the most effective use of assets. However, Frontline attacks required the majority of supplies, time, and men, creating an unbalance in the two strategies in favor of frontline attacks as seen in the image below.
Frontline assaults were more involved with forward deployment while covert operations were directed towards pre-determined strikes. Frontline assaults could be implemented at a moment’s notice. In emergency situations, AAVs could transport large amounts of troop’s great distances. Nevertheless, frontline strategies were not useful for situations which necessitated explicit skills. In these instances, covert operations came in handy. Covert operations were used in cases where time and stealth were of the utmost importance, as frontline assaults were rarely stealthy in nature and oftentimes dragged on for long periods of time. Due to their nature, frontline assaults required brute force for success while covert operations relied upon strategic deterrence.
When plans failed, frontline assaults lead to mass amounts of casualties whereas fewer lives were lost during covert operations. However, the lives that were lost during covert operations were of highly trained individuals in possession of elite skills. During frontline assaults, a continuous amount of supplies were required such as mortar rounds, food, and communications. Far fewer, although more specific, supplies were essential for covert operations due to their unique nature. Covert operations required special equipment such as SEAL Team Delivery Vehicles (SDVs), disarming equipment for Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) teams, and tactical command headquarters to manage small scale operations. Both strategies were important for the war time effort as neither strategy works effectively without the other.
When plans failed, frontline assaults lead to mass amounts of casualties whereas fewer lives were lost during covert operations. However, the lives that were lost during covert operations were of highly trained individuals in possession of elite skills. During frontline assaults, a continuous amount of supplies were required such as mortar rounds, food, and communications. Far fewer, although more specific, supplies were essential for covert operations due to their unique nature. Covert operations required special equipment such as SEAL Team Delivery Vehicles (SDVs), disarming equipment for Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) teams, and tactical command headquarters to manage small scale operations. Both strategies were important for the war time effort as neither strategy works effectively without the other.
Frontline Assault
|
Covert Operations
|